
Comments [2]
I was listening to performance studies academic Jennifer Parker-Starbuck recently, talking about Francis Bacon and French artist ORLAN. She described seeing Bacon's work at the Tate and how she was forced to "squint" and shield her eyes against seeing her own reflection (because of the lighting in the space). She described the experience as being " forced into a position of hybridized viewing".
What might this be like - to light these 'reflective' glass enclosures so that the audience is gently asked to negotiate themselves into or out of the viewing?
Apparently, in an interview, Bacon said:
"the glass helps unify the picture. I also like the distance between what has been done and the onlooker that the glass creates; I like, as it were, the removal of the object as far as possible" (Interviews with Francis Bacon, David Sylvester, 87).
Comments [0]
The below is taken from Gill Clarke's article Mind Is As In Motion. The William James quote is great for this concern or interest in labelling. How might the labelling implode or subvert this 'cutting of days and nights'?
ske
"In part such practices are trying to redress a balance, turning up the volume on the sensing, intuitive ‘self’, to meet the more dominant rational brain. Psychologist William James wrote insightfully, over a hundred years ago, of the limitations of our over-emphasis on conceptualising and labelling the world:
‘Out of time we cut ‘days’ and ‘nights’, ‘summers’ and ‘winters’. We say what each part of the sensible continuum is, and these abstract ‘whats’ are concepts. The intellectual life of man consists almost wholly in his substitution of a conceptual order for the perceptual order in which his experience originally comes.’
So dance can play a valuable role in re-asserting, re-experiencing this perceptual present, the undivided self."
Comments [0]
http://skellis.posterous.com/fleeting-4
- just for the Darwin quote.
Comments [0]
Greed eh? I guess I was thinking most about setting up the labelling system, and then of playing with ways in which to undermine the conventions of the label. Perhaps this relates to my earlier comment about the photos of the material from the summer (day of slience) ...
Comments [0]
In January 2009 Nat and I spent a day in silence in the studio. Vanessa had set the framing for the day. To map the 3mths leading up to and the 6mths prior, the deaths of Nat's brother and my mother. In silence. This is some of the writings recorded by each of us on this day.
Comments [0]
We moved and conversed around the idea of committing to some 'hard labour' in a 'pre-show' situation.
Comments [2]
Comments [2]